Monday, October 25, 2010
Guide to develop and print film and paper
http://reviews.ebay.com/Traditional-Black-amp-White-Print-Processing_
W0QQugidZ10000000005661073
I have written a guide on Black & White Film Processing, and when I sum up the facts, it is a lot easier to process film than it is to make a print in the darkroom, one that displays all of the intent you had when you pressed the shutter of your camera.
Let's start from the beginning. I’ve come to find out that print processing takes a lot of experience to do truly well. How to maximize the inherent potential in a given paper with a certain developer and to eke out the maximum of each negative is knowledge that is seriously hard work to come by. I'll try to advice on how to get a good start.
1. To choose a negative. If you look at your negatives on a light table, or hold it up against a window while there's daylight, to choose a 'technically' good negative, you should see detail in both the 'thinnest' and the 'densest' areas of it. Ideally it should also not have completely 'empty' thin areas (shadows or dark areas in the print) and completely black or opaque dense areas (highlights). That is more brightness range than most papers can handle.
2. To get a print without worrying about quality, it's easy to put the negative in the enlarger, raise the enlarger head to the appropriate height and printing size, focus on the paper easel, turn the enlarger lamp off, insert a paper, turn the lamp on again for some arbitrary time, move the print to the developer and leave it in there while agitating and removing it when it looks OK, then put it in the stop bath and finally fixer.
This way you will get something resembling a photographic print, but most likely a really bad one.
Getting good prints is really down to developing a good process, and for that you need a few things:
- Paper. I started with resin coated variable contrast paper, because it's cheap and available in many places still.
- Enlarger, with a lamp, lens, negative carrier, easel, focusing aid, and variable contrast filters.
- Paper developer, stop bath (water works fine if you change it every few prints), and fresh fixer.
- Safelight.
- Trays (one paper size larger than the paper you're using preferably), tongs.
- Beakers / graduates to mix chemistry, and a thermometer for temperature.
- A dark space.
- Dry compressed air to blow dust off negatives.
- Patience of a saint, dedication, and an understanding that it takes a LOT of time to get the results you want.
3. Contrast - what is it?
Contrast is the difference in tone between the darkest black and the brightest white that you produce in a print. There is overall contrast and local contrast.
Overall contrast is a judgement of the entire print where you see a good range of tones between black and white, along with a strong black and crisp whites.
Local contrast is basically the same thing but it talks about minute details of the print. Good local contrast aids in seeing the details of the print clearer, by having clear distinctions between bordering or 'local' tonal values.
Low contrast prints are thought of as looking ‘muddy’ by some, but can be very effective and beautiful with the right subject matter. High contrast prints look very ‘snappy’ to some and can be equally beautiful if used appropriately and creatively.
4. Paper Grades – Contrast Variations
Let's talk about paper, the first item needed. There are many kinds, but basically there are two categories:
A. Graded - graded paper has the same contrast from sheet to sheet in the same box, but are available in various contrast grades to purchase. Ilford Galerie is an example, and it is available in contrast grade 2 and 3. Once upon a time you could get 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 with 0 being the softest (least contrast) and 5 being the hardest (highest contrast). The availability today is grades 2, 3, and 4.
With graded paper, what determines the final contrast in the finished print is almost exclusively the contrast of your negative. This requires experience because you have to be able to interpret negatives and their contrast before you print them in order to select the correct paper. (Or if you are really good at what you are doing you can 'tailor' your negatives to always print well on a certain grade of paper).
B. Variable contrast - this type of paper is available as one single 'type', but you can vary the contrast by using multi contrast filters. With these filters you can vary the contrast according to the same contrast levels as graded paper, and sometimes more. The Ilford set that I have contains filters for grades: 00, 0, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3, 3.5, 4, 4.5, and 5. It is my opinion that not all of them are necessary, and I actually only use two of them, and I will explain why a little bit further down. These filters are designed to be introduced somewhere in the 'light path' between the enlarger light source and the printing-paper surface. Some enlargers have drawers they go in, others have small fixtures under the lens. The effect is the same.
Black & White photo paper is essentially sensitive to blue and green light. The graded papers are used without filters and are exposed to whatever blue and green light the light source (filtered through the negative) produces.
The variable contrast filters vary and determine how much blue and green light reaches the paper and therefore alters the contrast.
5 – Choice: Variable Contrast Paper
I will focus on using variable contrast paper, as it is by far the most commonly used, and it is the most economical to stock in your darkroom as you only need one box for all grades needed, while if you used graded paper, you would have to get one box of each grade, at least until you learn how to master 'tailoring' the negatives to a certain grade. Some people use graded paper with beautiful results, others use variable contrast; it’s mainly personal preference that dictates what you actually use.
6. Print density.
Print density is basically how dark the whole print becomes after it has been processed. There are three factors determining how dark your print will become.
A. Enlarging lens aperture. The enlarging lens has an aperture. This device has a ring that fits around the lens, and as you turn it, metal blades located between the glass elements of your lens move. They move to make the opening in the lens smaller or larger. There are numbers that correspond to which aperture you have chosen. The smallest number is the largest opening, and vice versa. A large aperture (low number) will let more light through the lens to reach the paper surface. Think of it as sunbathing. The longer you stay in the light, the more tan you will become. Same thing with photo paper. The more light that reaches the surface, the darker the print will become.
B. Enlarging time. According to the same reasoning as aperture - to get more light to the paper surface, you can either open the lens wider, or you can illuminate it longer.
C. Developing time. Many people make the mistake of taking the paper out of the developer when it 'looks right'. The amount of time it's in the developer is different every time, and that is a disaster if you want any consistency in your printing at all. You need to have a predetermined time, and if you think your print is either too light or too dark, you will have to lengthen or shorten your exposure time, or change your lens aperture.
I have chosen 3 minutes as my development time. It is pretty long by most standards, but it works for me and the results I desire. Most people use 1m00s, 1m30s, or 2m00s. Settle for one (I don't think the 1 minute option works real well in most situation, longer times mean the dark tones settle down much better usually).
7. Split Grade Printing
I use a technique that is called 'Split Grade Printing'. Straight filter printing means that you examine the negative and choose which variable contrast filter you use to make your print. Split Grade means I use two different filters in succession, but regardless of negative contrast.
I feel that Split Grade allows me a degree more control of the outcome and a nicer tonal range. I also have a much higher success rate in making prints I like – both my own and when I make prints from negatives that others bring.
Filter number 0 is a low contrast filter. It prints a negative of normal contrast to have less contrast in the print. The blacks are not as intense and rich, and the whites can seem a little dull. That is really useful if you have a negative with a lot of contrast, but we can also use this particular filter with a normal contrast negative and focus on printing the highlights to our liking, while completely disregarding what happens in the darker sections of the print.
I do what's called a test strip. First I put my negative into the negative holder, and adjust the enlarger to the column height that yields roughly the size print I want. Then I bring out the focusing aid and focus the enlarger until it's sharp (or sometimes I make it soft on purpose). I take one full sheet of paper, put it in the enlarging easel, and I cover 75% of it with opaque paper. I set my enlarger timer to 40 seconds, start it, and I count backwards from 40. When I get to 20 seconds I move the paper to cover 50%, at 10 seconds 75% and at 5 seconds I completely remove the cover to illuminate the whole print.
Then I submerse that full sheet of paper into the developer and agitate constantly for the first whole minute, then I lift the corner of the tray every 15 seconds. At 2m45s I lift the print out of the developer and let it drip off for 15 seconds. At precisely 3 minutes I put it in the stop bath. I agitate it there for about 20 seconds, lift it up and let it drain for 10 seconds. Finally I put it in the fixer. Usually fixing a paper takes about 1 minute for resin-coated (RC) stock (and 2 minutes for fiber based paper). I actually turn on the lights after 15 seconds because I'm full of anticipation to look at the results (and it’s safe to do so).
It is time to examine this first stage of the print. I look at the highlights only and determine at what exposure time I like the highlights.
Now I turn off the room lights and put a second piece of paper in the easel. I then proceed to expose this full sheet at the time I liked the highlights at Grade 0.
Now comes what you've been waiting for... Part Two…
I change the Grade 0 filter to the Grade 5, and on top of the initial Grade 0 exposure I now make the same 40 second procedure as before. From 40 to 20 seconds I cover 75%, from 20 to 10 I cover 50%, from 10 to 5 I cover 25%, and the last 5 I let the light fall on the entire print surface.
This sheet of paper now gets transferred into the developer, yet again for 3 minutes. At 2m45s I drain, at 3m00s I submerse in the stop bath. 20 seconds in the stop, let it drip off, and finally into the fixer it goes.
The Grade 5 filter is a high contrast filter. It will hardly make a difference in the brightest of the highlights at all, but it will significantly increase the density and the richness of the blacks. Mid-tones between black and white take on their final tone as well in combination with the Grade 0 exposure.
When safe I turn on the room lights and examine the print, and now I choose the combination of the Grade 0 and Grade 5 exposure I like the best. I make a note of these times and the lens aperture so I don't forget them. I actually take a lot more notes than that, and I keep them with the negatives in case I have to make a reprint when people order prints. This way I can make an exact copy of the original.
Step three of this Split Grade process is to expose the full sheet to your selected Grade 0 and Grade 5 times. Something extremely important is to always do them in the same order. Some people like to do the Grade 5 first, others like to do the Grade 0 first. I like the last technique of Grade 0 first.
So I remove the Grade 5 filter and put the Grade 0 filter back in the filter holder, set my enlarger timer for the time I chose, and expose a new sheet of paper. Then I again change to the Grade 5 filter and expose for the time chosen for that filtration. Now the paper goes into the developer of course, let the 3 minutes pass, stop, fix, and now you should have a print that is a good work print.
8. Work Print
A work print is the first step of making a fine print. A work print is a basic rendition of the subject you photographed. A fine print is one that has been refined in many ways. Here are a couple of techniques.
9. Dodging
I have a set of tools that are attached to steel wire. They are sized roughly like a 25 cent coin and I have an oval, a square, a rectangle, a circle, and a triangle. By putting this device under the enlarging lens during the time exposure, I can cover certain parts of the print that I believe will make it look better if it was brighter.
Since we're doing split grade printing, dodging the Grade 0 exposure would basically give you brighter highlights and mid tones. Dodging the Grade 5 exposure would give you less intense blacks and dark-gray tones.
10. Burning In
Burning in is something you do during additional time after your main exposure is over. You shine more light on certain parts of the print that you would believe look better if they were darker.
Once again in Split Grade printing, burning in Grade 0 would mean darker highlights and light-gray tones. Burning in Grade 5 would mean more intense and richer black and dark-gray tones.
After I am done with my work print I let it dry and I keep it around for a while. I pick it up once in a while and look at it. I hang it on my office wall. Then I decide before my next printing session what areas I want to burn in, which ones I want to dodge, and at what filter grade.
Then when I go in the dark-room again I have a clear idea of what I want to achieve. This is a technique that sounds like a lot of work. It is definitely a lot of work. But I believe that unless you did your absolute best with each print you make, then you cheated yourself of an opportunity to really learn about what works and what doesn't work. And I would much rather come out of the darkroom with one print that I am wholly satisfied with than ten of them that are mediocre.
A couple of final thoughts:
a) Get one type of paper, one type of developer. Always use the same dilution on the developer and get used to these materials. All, and I mean ALL, papers and developers are capable of fine results. The results you get are MUCH more dependent on your technique and skill than the subtle differences between various materials. Please don’t fall in that trap.
b) Buy fresh paper and fresh chemistry. Old paper usually looks very bad and has poor contrast. Old chemistry – the same thing. Fresh paper can be inexpensive if you look in the right place.
c) Have fun, be creative, shoot lots of film and experiment with lighting, subject matter, and print all kinds of negatives. It is rewarding in the long run.
Now it's your turn. I wish you good luck if you decide to use this technique, or any other for that matter. There is no shortage of advice out there. This is just my method and what works for me.
I wish you good light!
- Thomas
Guide to develop film
http://reviews.ebay.com/Black-amp-White-Film-
Developing-Guide_W0QQugidZ10000000003726995
The first thing to remember when learning to develop film successfully is to stick to one film, one developer, and one method of development. It is the only good way to learn a sound technique and to fully explore and maximize the potential of the film and ultimately your print.
Keep in mind that the only purpose of developing film is to make the best prints you can make. It doesn't matter how the negatives look to your eyes as long as they produce the results in the prints that you originally wanted.
What films and developers to use? That is a question I get a lot. Any of the available ones will give you acceptable results, and you can't really go wrong. It also depends on what results you're after. Remember that there are no silver bullets when it comes to film or chemistry. They can help you get the results you're after, but the main factor is technique in exposing the film, developing it, and ultimately printing it. The work of the artist is by far more important than the materials used, so try to focus on repeatable results, and please remember to print your images often, only then can you truly know if your negatives are developed well or not.
Important factors:
1. Temperature. Some developers work fine in a temperature range between 65*F and 80*F, others don't. It's safest to keep the temperature you choose to develop at constant, at least in the beginning, and since so many recommended developing times are recommended at 68*F (or 20*C) I stick to that temperature religiously.
2. Time. Consistency requires exact timing, and the best way to achieve that consistency is to make sure the procedure for developing your film is the same every time. Don't change a thing.
3. Persistance. Don't give up if you don't get results immediately.
Basics:
When developing negative black and white film, the image is of course a negative of what your print will look like. That means the areas with the lowest density of developed silver will be the darkest in the print, and the areas with the highest density of developed silver will become the highlights. The dark tones in the print, or the 'thin' parts of the negative develop slowly, because they receive less light at the time of exposure. How much detail you get in this area of your negative depends on how you exposed it in the camera. Overexposed negatives will generally produce very generous detail in the print shadow areas, while underexposed (too little light) will invariably produce blocked up shadow areas without any detail at all. When you develop your film, the density of the developed silver in those areas is practically unaffected by developing the film longer.
The dense areas of your negative, or the highlights of your print, is a different story. This portion of your negative is determined solely by development. Several factors affects the results, mainly developer concentration, developing time, how you agitate your tank, as well as chemistry temperature. This is the reason why it's so important to be accurate in your methods of developing film.
My method of developing film:
The following method works great for me. You may wish to adopt it and do as I do, or you may find that some other method works better for you. We all have individual needs and desire different looks in the finished print.
1. Presoak the film in plain water. I do this for 3 minutes in water that is the same temperature as the developing chemistry. There are some developers that specifically shouldn't be used with a presoak, but 95% of them benefit from it. (The film emulsion is embedded in gelatin, and it swells. Presoaking makes sure the gelatin is properly swelled up by the time the developer is poured in and ensures more even development).
2. Developer. 20*C or 68*F, I mix one shot 'single use' batches of developer just minutes prior to developing the film. After pouring the presoak out, I immediately pour the developer into the tank. When it's all in the tank I start a timer that displays seconds and minutes, counting backwards from my predetermined developing time. I agitate for the entire first minute by inverting my tank with a lid tightly capped onto it. After about 50-55 seconds have passed, I very firmly rap the tank on the counter space six or seven times. This helps air bubbles that can get trapped on the film to dislodge and come to the top. The air bubbles will adversely affect your film development and turn up as marks, usually round and along the edge of the film strip.
3. Agitation. I completely invert the tank every minute a couple of times, and before setting the tank back down, I rap the tank on the counter top to, once again, dislodge those harmful air bubbles. The inversion ensures that the mixed developer acts evenly on the film surface.
4. Stop bath. 15 seconds prior to the film developing time being up, I start pouring the developer out. Then right as the development time ends, I pour pure water into the tank (at 20*C or 68*F, same as the developer). I do NOT use a stop bath since it is known to sometimes be the source of 'pinholes' in the film emulsion, showing up as dark spots on your prints. Developer is alkaline, stop bath is acid. The very large difference between developer and stop bath pH causes this phenomena to happen. You can use a stop bath if you like, but water stops development almost as well, and you run much less risk of pinholes. I change the water a couple of times for a total rinse of about 1-1.5 minutes.
5. Fixing. This is a critical stage of developing your film. It is extremely important to use fresh fixer, because it removes the unexposed silver in the emulsion that the developer didn't develop. If your fixer isn't fresh, or is spent, it will loose its ability to remove that unwanted silver. I always test my fixer before I use it by putting an undeveloped piece of film into the solution. The film strip should clear within the time the manufacturer recommends to use the fixer. I double the time it takes.
The fixer I use is alkaline. You can use acid fixer if you like. They are OK, but alkaline fixers wash out of the emulsion faster and easier. Do not use an alkaline fixer after using an acid stop bath.
I agitate constantly for the entire duration of the fixing. My fixer takes one minute to clear the unexposed silver when it's fresh, so I fix for two minutes. Then I pour the fixer back into its container and continue to use it until it's spent (when the clearing time exceeds the manufacturer's recommended fixing time, or preferably before that point, it should be discarded).
6. Washing. I use the Ilford-method of washing my film. After pouring the fixer out, I rinse with fresh water and a couple of inversions. Then I dump water. Pour in fresh water, invert tank five times. Dump water. Pour in fresh water, invert tank ten times. Dump water. Pour in fresh water, invert tank twenty times. Dump water. Rinse in fresh water for about five minutes, and finally do a rinse in distilled water to avoid drying marks on the film to the largest possible extent.
7. Wash aid. Some people like to use wash aids such as Kodak Hypo-clearing agent. With the alkaline fixer and the Ilford washing method there is no need. The purpose of washing film is to wash out unwanted chemicals. The hypo-clearing agent itself must be washed out for archival washing, so you're back to square one. With acid fixers, it may be necessary to use, however.
8. Rinse aid. Kodak Photo-flo (one among many similar products, Kodak is the best known), is a good tool to help the water to run off from the emulsion surface. Use distilled water and follow the instructions.
9. Drying. I hang my film from a nylon line with weights on the end. No air movement to minimize dust sticking to the film emulsion. Drying time varies with Relative Humidity level.
This method has been bullet proof for me. Which materials to use is related to personal taste and you will get as many suggestions as people you ask which film or developer is best.
Good luck, and remember to stick to selections that are the same every time, at least until you master those materials and explore them fully. Then you may venture off and try something else on an experiment level. Until then, keep it simple!
- Thomas
Monday, October 18, 2010
Jan Grarup
Jan Grarup is a Danish born press photographer. He concentrates in war and conflict photography. He has worked as a staff photographer and freelance for sometime now, and has won many awards for his depictions of various conflicts throughout the world. Here are some photographs he took throughout East Africa during last November. They depict "climate refugees", or people displaced because of the severe drought throughout their homelands. Six years of drought have forced many of them to travel across Africa to find better living conditions.
http://lens.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/02/23/showcase-127/
http://lens.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/02/23/showcase-127/
Mimi Mollica
Mimi Mollica is a Sicilian born photographer. His most recent work is a series of photographs that depict life in Dakar during the construction of the Dakar-Diamniado motorway in Senegal. This is a privately financed toll highway construction project. He used this as an opportunity to guide viewers through a "cultural adjustment to a changing urban landscape." Mollica used a medium-format camera and color film. " He believes that the square format increases the reading time of each photo and provides more opportunity for interaction both in the image and between it and the viewer."
http://lens.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/10/07/senegals-changing-urban-landscape/?ref=africa
-Christine Tampakis
http://lens.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/10/07/senegals-changing-urban-landscape/?ref=africa
-Christine Tampakis
Kate Hopewell-Smith
“I love what I do - which is all about the unique combination of the craft and the people.”
- Helena Salvo
- Kate Hopewell-Smith
Kate is an exceptional lifestyle photographer, i cane across her work by chance while i was looking at some pictures on google. She is a professional photographer who works throughout the UK but shoots mainly in London, Buckinghamshire and the surrounding counties.
Her favourite subjects are people especially children and families. Her photographs seem to capture the reality of the scene, without showing the viewer the presence of the camera. I especially loved the angles she chose to portray her subjects and the colors.
There isn't much about her on the web, as personal information are not disclosed, but i thought that her work was worth sharing.
- Helena Salvo
Monday, October 11, 2010
Robert Mapplethorpe
"I don't like that particular word 'shocking.' I'm looking for the unexpected. I'm looking for things I've never seen before … I was in a position to take those pictures. I felt an obligation to do them."
Robert Mapplethorpe, born 1946, takes photographs that at first glance seem very simple, but have much more depth to them upon a closer look. He broke into the art scene in New York by taking photos of the New York S and M scene, thus causing quite a stir. Most of his photographs are self portraits, male and female nudes, and close-ups of different flowers. His photographs focus on one central image, but that one image is very intricate and powerful. He became one of the most influential photographers of the 20th century because of his provocative images. He's worked with people such as Patti Smith, Andy Warhol, and Lisa Lyon.
Claudia Rotondo
Robert Mapplethorpe, born 1946, takes photographs that at first glance seem very simple, but have much more depth to them upon a closer look. He broke into the art scene in New York by taking photos of the New York S and M scene, thus causing quite a stir. Most of his photographs are self portraits, male and female nudes, and close-ups of different flowers. His photographs focus on one central image, but that one image is very intricate and powerful. He became one of the most influential photographers of the 20th century because of his provocative images. He's worked with people such as Patti Smith, Andy Warhol, and Lisa Lyon.
Claudia Rotondo
Friday, October 8, 2010
The Enlarger
The Enlarger is that machine in the dark room you must use in order to create test strips, contact sheets and prints. With the knob at back you can raise and lower the enlarger. This allows you to decide the dimensions of the borders of your print. With the knob on the enlarger, you are able to focus the negative projection. You must insert a filter into the top shelf of the enlarger. Use a number 2 filter, as it is flexible for starting you test strips and contact sheets. Insert the negative into the lower shelf, paying attention that the numbers on the negative are not upside down, and especially important, that the negative is not reversed, meaning glossy side needs to be up. Then focus the negative with the enlarger. Once it seems in focus, use the focometer understand the and focus precisely by seeing the grain of the negative. At right on the table you will find the timer. It has a switch with three settings. The top switch provides continuous light, the middle setting is stand by, and switching down is off. When you are ready to set the timer for your test strip, make sure the red filter is screening the enlarger light. This way you can place the photo paper beneath the lens without burning it to focus. Set the timer while the switch is at standby, and remove the red filter to allow light to expose the paper. Make sure all extra photo paper is already put away so as to not expose it to the light. Press the orange button for the timed light exposure to occur. In order to choose a time setting, guess at first, the more printing you do, the easier it will become to have an idea of exposure length. Once the light switches off, place the paper in the developer for a maximum of 3min. Then in the water for about 30sec. Then in the Fixer for a minute or two. Then move it too the water. Leave it for a few minutes, then press it against the cabinet so it stick, and at an angle so the water runs free of it leaving it dry. GOOD LUCK!
Where to buy paper for black and white prints
Piazza della Cancelleria, close to Campo de Fiori.
De Bernardis. Ask for Carlo Pavia and tell him what you need and that you are a student in Serafino Amatos class.
Ilford or Tetenal, RC Multigrade, Pearl
1 pack large size of 24x30 for contact sheets, and final prints
1 pack Medium size
1 pack Small size
De Bernardis. Ask for Carlo Pavia and tell him what you need and that you are a student in Serafino Amatos class.
Ilford or Tetenal, RC Multigrade, Pearl
1 pack large size of 24x30 for contact sheets, and final prints
1 pack Medium size
1 pack Small size
Magic and the chemistry of photography
Film is a process of taking evenly spaced grains of silver that have been crystallized into halides by potassium derivatives and making them dance when exposed to precise amounts of light. During manufacture this photosensitive substance is pressed into thin strips of film and attached to a corresponding strip of plastic. Due to the paucity of our knowledge of the laws of physics and also to trade secrets of the film companies, no one really knows how it all works. It is a mystery, such as the art can be referred to a kind of magic being played with light. When Edison and others first began debuting the earliest photographs, it must have seemed magical to their first viewers. For the first time in history, a moment could be captured with perfect accuracy and clarity, albeit if only in black and white in the early days.
As light passes through the film, the silver halides react by converting to a spectrum of clear to gray to black. They create a latent image to be developed. The luminescence of modern film has a ratio of these “colors” of 1 to 4 to 6, respectively. Early films were only sensitive to blue light, until dyes were invented, primarily for blue and green (known as “orthochromatic”), later red was invented (“panchromatic”). It is even possible to record infrared light waves. Because early films were only blue-sensitive, they could be developed under a red light. Now we need completely dark room.
What happens in the dark room is simple chemistry. Development of the the film and the print is a chemical process incorporating up to a dozen different chemicals. At a set amount of time, temperature and agitation, various reducing agents convert the activated halides into metallic silver. These are only active in alkaline environments, so an accelerator like borax, sodium bicarbonate or lye are added. Its concentration determines how quickly the film develops. Sodium sulfite then acts as a preservative to prevent these chemicals from breaking down over time. Additionally, restrainers can be included to add clarity. The stop bath halts the development, Some photographers add acetic acid to it. The fixer, typically a thiosulfate, among other chemicals, dissolves the undeveloped halides, which are then washed off in a final bath. Prints can be toned with such chemicals as sulfides, selenium or gold in order to attain certain effects.
Source: Schafer, John P. The Ansel Adams Guide to Basic Techniques of Photography
Thursday, October 7, 2010
Portrait Photography
Yousuf Karsh (1908 - 2002)
One of the masters of 20th century photography. A Canadian photographer, his body of work includes portraits of statesmen, artists, musicians, authors, scientists, and men and women of accomplishment. His big break came with his portrait of Winston Churchill in 1941. Of the 100 most notable people of the 20th century, Karsh has photographed 51 of them. Karsh was noted for his expertise of studio lighting. He often would light the subject's hands seperately from the rest of the subject to provide a distinctive transcendence to the photograph and really bring out the character of the subject. He was known for capturing the essence of a person in portraits, relying on the exact second that his subjects would drop their mask and you'd be able to see for a glimpse the true humanity in them. His extraordinary and unique portfolio presents the viewer with an intimate and compassionate view of humanity.
One of the masters of 20th century photography. A Canadian photographer, his body of work includes portraits of statesmen, artists, musicians, authors, scientists, and men and women of accomplishment. His big break came with his portrait of Winston Churchill in 1941. Of the 100 most notable people of the 20th century, Karsh has photographed 51 of them. Karsh was noted for his expertise of studio lighting. He often would light the subject's hands seperately from the rest of the subject to provide a distinctive transcendence to the photograph and really bring out the character of the subject. He was known for capturing the essence of a person in portraits, relying on the exact second that his subjects would drop their mask and you'd be able to see for a glimpse the true humanity in them. His extraordinary and unique portfolio presents the viewer with an intimate and compassionate view of humanity.
Winston Churchill
Audrey Hepburn
Humphrey Bogart
Fidel Castro
Albert Einstein
Muhammad Ali
"My chief joy is to photograph the great in heart, in mind, and in spirit, whether they be famous or humble."
- Cody Barz
Lines in photographs
Galen Rowell (August 23, 1940 – August 11, 2002)
Rowell, an american photographer, began his photography career as a hobby and way of sharing his experiences that stemed from his true passion of rock climbing and other outdoor activities. His love of nature and the outdoors introduced him to many beautiful landscapes, which he began capturing to share with friends and family. Galen's photography transcends the element of the photographer just capturing the scene though, he is centrally involved in the activity and the scenery, relaying to the viewer the element of adventure and emotion that is experienced when scaling a mountain or traveling in the wilderness. During his career Galen received much praise and recognition, including receiving an Ansel Adams award in 1984, as well as a National Science Foundation Artists and Writers Grant to photograph Antartica. Galen Rowell died in 2002 in a plane crash on his way home from a photo workshop class in Alaska.
- Cody Barz
Rowell, an american photographer, began his photography career as a hobby and way of sharing his experiences that stemed from his true passion of rock climbing and other outdoor activities. His love of nature and the outdoors introduced him to many beautiful landscapes, which he began capturing to share with friends and family. Galen's photography transcends the element of the photographer just capturing the scene though, he is centrally involved in the activity and the scenery, relaying to the viewer the element of adventure and emotion that is experienced when scaling a mountain or traveling in the wilderness. During his career Galen received much praise and recognition, including receiving an Ansel Adams award in 1984, as well as a National Science Foundation Artists and Writers Grant to photograph Antartica. Galen Rowell died in 2002 in a plane crash on his way home from a photo workshop class in Alaska.
- Cody Barz
Monday, October 4, 2010
Marilyn Silverstone
Marilyn Silverstone was an English photographer born in London in 1929. She began to photograph as a freelancer in 1955 and spent time working in Asia, Africa, Europe, the Soviet Union and Central America. After a three-month assignment in India in 1959, Silverstone moved to New Dehli and lived there for fifteen years. Her photographs have been seen on the pages of Newsweek, Life, Vogue and National Geographic. Marilyn Silverstone passed away in October 1999.
What intrigued me most about Ms. Silverstone was the following quote listed on her Magnum page:
"A photograph is a subjective impression. It is what the photographer sees. No matter how hard we try to get into the skin, into the feeling of the subject or situation, however much we empathize, it is still what we see that comes out in the images, it is our reaction to the subject and in the end, the whole corpus of our work becomes a portrait of ourselves."
Allison Garlick
History of Portraits-André Adolphe Disdéri (1819-c.1889)
Self-portrait of and by Andre Disderi |
The technique and process that Disdéri developed for his creation was incredibly cost effective, in that a negative was produced that could make multiple prints. By using a sliding plate holder and a camera with four lenses, eight negatives could be taken on a single 8" x 10" glass plate. This process eventually replaced the daguerreotype.
Napoleon |
Juggler |
Mery Laurent |
Ballerina |
Ballet Dancers (Paris Opéra, early 1860s) |
Princess Alexandra of Wales (1866) |
Sources:
http://www.photographymuseum.com/histsw.htm
http://www.vam.ac.uk/vastatic/microsites/photography/processframe.php?processid=pr004
http://www.picturehistory.com/product/id/10967
http://www.luminous-lint.com/app/photographer/Andre_Adolphe-Eugene__Disderi/A/
http://codex99.com/photography/49.html
-Jennifer Maldonado
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)